you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
i want to do that too
so the method has to be autonomous
idk
as in
i dont understand magnetisation
no i haven't really read anything
isaac
like magnets
what do you mean
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
is everyoneback on tumblr now
plato
have you read
i understand
sorry i am texting like a slav
send your tumblr
your feed looks like my tumblr
yeah
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
its good
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
autonomy of learning
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
whats your name?
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
bro i read nothing in my life
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class