there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

no like which do people call me

i really havent

all that is to say

so the method has to be autonomous

yeah

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

Hours staring at the ceiling, the wall, curling up into a ball. It seems annoyed with the light, it kind of recoils. It will get lighter. I wonder where it goes in the day.

December 2025

...

2 (actually index). two is company

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

was it worth it

Slug

the site i am dreaming

hello reader,

wait what is that

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

autonomy of learning

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

as in

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

its performative

abrar?