plato

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

so the method has to be autonomous

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

is everyoneback on tumblr now

magnetisation/form

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

lol

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

or never left

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

i want to do that too

we need to be deconstructing our identities

like first name

something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever

so an active mazelike process