think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
magnetises a pin
no i haven't really read anything
like first name
ahnaf abrar
plato
bro i read nothing in my life
isaac
and the fake qualifier
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
its good
its good
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
i was tempted to lie about my name
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
abrar?
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
autonomy of learning
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
i love it here
we can only engage in such a way
not their contents
all that is to say
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
...
yeah
division of reality is straying away from it
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 22:11:24