much more tactility

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

i want to do that too

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

is this you as well

we can only engage in such a way

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

and the fake qualifier

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

what do you think my name is

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

Rain, starting

so an active mazelike process

lol

we need to be deconstructing our identities

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

        13       |
                |
                |
            H   |
                |
                |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
                |

all that is to say

that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.