i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
autonomy of learning
its good
isaac
i love it here
so an active mazelike process
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
you cannot feed someone truth
and the fake qualifier
was it worth it
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
magnetisation/form
i want to do that too
we need to be deconstructing our identities
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
...
is this you as well
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
i was tempted to lie about my name
After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting
The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.
i am quite illiterate on producing technology