idk
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
lol
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
lol yea
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
yeah
division of reality is straying away from it
have you read
magnetisation/form
magnetises a pin
autonomy of learning
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
is everyoneback on tumblr now
the textwall is as much for me as it is for you
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
sorry i am texting like a slav
is this you as well
currently
thank you
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
so an active mazelike process
so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged
Lift Analysis
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class