okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

so the method has to be autonomous

your feed looks like my tumblr

barren land

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

yeah

magnetisation/form

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

much more tactility

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

lol

i have read not even 1 book

autonomy of learning

send your tumblr

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

fw

so an active mazelike process

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

or never left

so at the end

as in

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

not so on: yvf(wthw)

the site i am dreaming

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

you cannot feed someone truth

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

and the fake qualifier

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

...

Hours staring at the ceiling, the wall, curling up into a ball. It seems annoyed with the light, it kind of recoils. It will get lighter. I wonder where it goes in the day.