there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

is everyoneback on tumblr now

so at the end

you cannot feed someone truth

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

division of reality is straying away from it

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

so the method has to be autonomous

not their contents

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

magnetisation/form

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

i really havent

no i haven't really read anything

its good short few pages

isaac newton

have you read

god being the centre magnet

like first name

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

all that is to say

I Write Goodbye Letter

yeah

i dont understand magnetisation

idk

autonomy of learning

...

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

or never left

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

and the fake qualifier

The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.