as in

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

barren land

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

you cannot feed someone truth

so an active mazelike process

idk

yeah

i love it here

isaac newton

like first name

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

no like which do people call me

god being the centre magnet

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

magnetises a pin

i dont understand magnetisation

like magnets

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

much more tactility

your feed looks like my tumblr

which magnetises chains of pins

and the fake qualifier

really i want the internet

i understand