you cannot feed someone truth
what do you mean
i really havent
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
isaac newton
whats your name?
have you read
and the fake qualifier
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
is this you as well
plato
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️
send your tumblr
not so on: yvf(wthw)
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
like first name
that looks like my instagram account
i was tempted to lie about my name
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
autonomy of learning
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
yeah
The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.
you know who you are. no more time, not like
1
. way too specific.mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
as in
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now