much more tactility
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
whats your name?
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
so the method has to be autonomous
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
autonomy of learning
feel you
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
have you read
not their contents
not so on: yvf(wthw)
we can only engage in such a way
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
you cannot feed someone truth
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
like magnets
and the fake qualifier
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation