fw

all that is to say

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

so the method has to be autonomous

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

so at the end

plato

whats your name?

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

like first name

magnetisation/form

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

i dont understand magnetisation

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

so an active mazelike process

as in

i understand

ion

magnetises a pin

not their contents

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

is this you as well

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

December 2025

was it worth it

division of reality is straying away from it

The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.