okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
sorry i am texting like a slav
isaac newton
isaac
its good
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
like magnets
not their contents
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
its good
much more tactility
magnetises a pin
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
plato
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
we can only engage in such a way
i love to walk around and see things and take photos and go online and look at websites and click on links and take screenshots i love to surf and i love to browse
no i haven't really read anything
I'm in a crowded lift and a girl I've never met tells me she thinks she might love me.
The lift won't stop at any floor, and I can't talk in front of all these people.
i understand
there's probably something in that, but I don't feel like thinking about it too much yet.
currently
whats your name?
so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged