...

have you read

lol

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

we can only engage in such a way

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

idk

as in

so at the end

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

thank you

autonomy of learning

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

your feed looks like my tumblr

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

its good

no like which do people call me

Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:37:17

Today I felt like starting

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

and the fake qualifier