so the method has to be autonomous
abrar?
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
all that is to say
its good
ion
fw
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
so an active mazelike process
plato
so at the end
or never left
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
send your tumblr
i love it here
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
propensity within someone
not their contents
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
you know who you are. no more time, not like
1
. way too specific.