so the method has to be autonomous

abrar?

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

all that is to say

its good

we can only engage in such a way

ion

isaac

fw

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

so an active mazelike process

plato

so at the end

or never left

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

send your tumblr

i love it here

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

propensity within someone

not their contents

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

. way too specific.