i understand

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

division of reality is straying away from it

god being the centre magnet

fw

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

what do you think my name is

like magnets

thank you

isaac newton

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

plato

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

ion

yeah

its good

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

This is a website run by a narcissist who can't produce anything without the hope that it is seen and loved but can't act due to the fear of it being seen and hated. They immediately feel the need to ask Jack GPT to define whatever this feeling is in the hope that understanding it will mean control over it and control over it will mean that they can stop it.

no i haven't really read anything