i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
was it worth it
have you read
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
so the method has to be autonomous
so an active mazelike process
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
much more tactility
isaac newton
but i respect your search
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46
its good
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 22:11:24
i love it here
which magnetises chains of pins
i want to do that too
really i want the internet
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:38:49
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
sorry i am texting like a slav
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
"I'm only attracted to you", he replies. "Like, you only."
isaac
that looks like my instagram account
magnetises a pin
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
i dont understand magnetisation