i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
ahnaf abrar
not their contents
i was tempted to lie about my name
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
abrar?
feel you
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
plato
i understand
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
bro i read nothing in my life
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
its good short few pages
so the method has to be autonomous
was it worth it
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
and the fake qualifier
...
its good
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
plato
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
your feed looks like my tumblr