i have read not even 1 book
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
its performative
yeah
propensity within someone
its good
we need to be deconstructing our identities
autonomy of learning
as in
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
all that is to say
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
ahnaf abrar
i dont understand magnetisation
which magnetises chains of pins
ion
lol
magnetises a pin
lol yea
what do you think my name is
much more tactility
its good short few pages
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
Dreams like these are highly symbolic and emotionally intense. Here’s a breakdown of common interpretations:
not their contents