there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
all that is to say
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
which magnetises chains of pins
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
like first name
was it worth it
god being the centre magnet
magnetisation/form
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
thank you
propensity within someone
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
plato
i understand
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
bro i read nothing in my life
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
yeah
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
is this you as well
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
isaac newton
like magnets
i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then
Better Lift
Their voices are saying they haven't and shouldn't fuck but want to so bad, or have fucked and can't again but want to so bad, or something like that. Would this be easier if they were birds? Incel kind of question... I'm not following the conversation, but I'm still listening. He's talking in this slightly begging way. It's a way of talking that asks for pity, like he's already tried appealing to every other one of her sensibilities. Incel kind of observation... Maybe he just talks like that, in some upspeak derivative. Haha unless?