no like which do people call me
is this you as well
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
i dont understand magnetisation
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
so an active mazelike process
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
its good
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
plato
lol yea
like first name
i have read not even 1 book
whats your name?
yeah
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
barren land
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
we can only engage in such a way
you cannot feed someone truth
propensity within someone
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
there's probably something in that, but I don't feel like thinking about it too much yet.
December 2025
abrar?