fw
we can only engage in such a way
so the method has to be autonomous
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
your feed looks like my tumblr
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
you cannot feed someone truth
ion
lol
propensity within someone
send your tumblr
December 2025
idk
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
what do you mean
whats your name?
The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now