we can only engage in such a way

we need to be deconstructing our identities

which magnetises chains of pins

bro i read nothing in my life

your feed looks like my tumblr

sorry i am texting like a slav

much more tactility

magnetises a pin

fw

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

thank you

ion

was it worth it

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

so the method has to be autonomous

plato

its good short few pages

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

abrar?

i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me

Today I felt like starting

It's

dusk

with this post net clarity and the hours of nothing that followed I realise this is going to be awful.

isaac

i was tempted to lie about my name

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting

it is hopeful

I'm in a crowded lift and a girl I've never met tells me she thinks she might love me.
The lift won't stop at any floor, and I can't talk in front of all these people.

and the fake qualifier

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things