but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos

lol

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

so the method has to be autonomous

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

all that is to say

magnetisation/form

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

magnetises a pin

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

we can only engage in such a way

i love it here

isaac

autonomy of learning

not their contents

you cannot feed someone truth

propensity within someone

what do you mean

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

no i haven't really read anything

sorry i am texting like a slav

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

wait what is that