like first name
propensity within someone
or never left
we can only engage in such a way
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
fw
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
division of reality is straying away from it
not their contents
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
"I'm only attracted to you", he replies. "Like, you only."
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
"Put a blanket."
magnetisation/form
yeah
idk
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 21:54:03
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
bro i read nothing in my life
Maybe, Jack, I'm doing this because I'm English?
really i want the internet
not so on: yvf(wthw)