so the method has to be autonomous

so at the end

its good

yeah

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

i understand

i love it here

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

division of reality is straying away from it

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

we can only engage in such a way

all that is to say

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

its good

like first name

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

like magnets

have you read

thank you

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

magnetisation/form

you cannot feed someone truth

ion

which magnetises chains of pins

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

it is hopeful

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike

i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given