...
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
isaac
so the method has to be autonomous
plato
abrar?
you cannot feed someone truth
i understand
as in
not their contents
what do you mean
idk
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
its performative
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
its good short few pages
like first name
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
much more tactility
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i really havent
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
feel you
whats your name?
ahnaf abrar
and the fake qualifier
like magnets
Dreams like these are highly symbolic and emotionally intense. Here’s a breakdown of common interpretations:
its good
magnetises a pin
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.