like first name

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

lol yea

so at the end

division of reality is straying away from it

lol

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

much more tactility

propensity within someone

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

you cannot feed someone truth

autonomy of learning

or never left

its performative

fw

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

something religious, a kind of complex,

it will get lighter

, something washing, cleansing, revealing, etc.


like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

yeah

Style

Better Lift

Garden Post-Dusk, Birds Above, In Another Life

barren land

with this post net clarity and the hours of nothing that followed I realise this is going to be awful.



we can only engage in such a way

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos

thank you