think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

what do you mean

i understand

ion

whats your name?

lol yea

i have read not even 1 book

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

no i haven't really read anything

so an active mazelike process

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

all that is to say

send your tumblr

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

sorry i am texting like a slav

so at the end

its good

i dont understand magnetisation

its good

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i want to do that too

and the fake qualifier

wait what is that

it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful

the site i am dreaming

yeah