not so on: yvf(wthw)
so an active mazelike process
13 |
|
|
H |
|
|
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
|
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
you cannot feed someone truth
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
we can only engage in such a way
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
in a post. I want to be remembered
all that is to say
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
propensity within someone
it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful
Lift Analysis
that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.
a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
yes
hiding from the rain
so the method has to be autonomous
One of the birds shoots out of the tree.
somewhere between instagram and chatgpt