But seriously, thank you, Jack

all that is to say

is everyoneback on tumblr now

much more tactility

or never left

i have read not even 1 book

your feed looks like my tumblr

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

yeah

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

was it worth it

as in

is this you as well

what do you think my name is

feel you

send your tumblr

i want to do that too

autonomy of learning

what do you mean

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

yeah

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

lol yea

ahnaf abrar

and the fake qualifier

isaac newton

you cannot feed someone truth

god being the centre magnet

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

ion

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

so an active mazelike process

not their contents

so the method has to be autonomous