Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.

bro i read nothing in my life

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

sorry i am texting like a slav

its good

its good

whats your name?

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

so an active mazelike process

as in

have you read

ion

what do you mean

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

not their contents

which magnetises chains of pins

division of reality is straying away from it

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

lol yea

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

like first name

abrar?

we can only engage in such a way

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

in a post. I want to be remembered

something religious, a kind of complex,

it will get lighter