mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
"Anyway, you're you. I mean, look at you!" she says. "You could get with anyone, anyone in the street. Really."
something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 21:22:59
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
so the method has to be autonomous
what do you mean
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
December 2025
division of reality is straying away from it
all that is to say
i am quite illiterate on producing technology
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
but i respect your search
really i want the internet
and the fake qualifier
...
somewhere between instagram and chatgpt
a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
is this you as well
barren land
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
so an active mazelike process
like first name
something religious, a kind of complex,
it will get lighter
, something washing, cleansing, revealing, etc.