there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

so the method has to be autonomous

you cannot feed someone truth

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

magnetisation/form

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.

or never left

i really havent

send link

much more tactility

we can only engage in such a way

and the fake qualifier

i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then

it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!

not so on: yvf(wthw)

I Write Goodbye Letter

so an active mazelike process

Slug

so at the end

...

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

2 (actually index). two is company

all that is to say

its performative