like magnets
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
its good
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
i dont understand magnetisation
autonomy of learning
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
all that is to say
much more tactility
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
plato
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
so an active mazelike process
magnetisation/form
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
idk
its good short few pages
wait what is that
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
no like which do people call me
which magnetises chains of pins
i really havent
so the method has to be autonomous
we need to be deconstructing our identities
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
the site i am dreaming
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
i want to do that too
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
Hours staring at the ceiling, the wall, curling up into a ball. It seems annoyed with the light, it kind of recoils. It will get lighter. I wonder where it goes in the day.
Thank you, Jack
what do you mean