and so on. not wanting the rhyming / clanging

i have read not even 1 book

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

so at the end

abrar?

ahnaf abrar

so the method has to be autonomous

is this you as well

not their contents

i love it here

division of reality is straying away from it

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

isaac newton

ion

plato

i dont understand magnetisation

as in

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

thank you

what do you mean

or never left

no like which do people call me

we need to be deconstructing our identities

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

which magnetises chains of pins

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

was it worth it

sorry i am texting like a slav

is everyoneback on tumblr now

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

plato

feel you