so at the end
what do you think my name is
lol yea
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
like magnets
i want to do that too
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
yeah
somewhere between instagram and chatgpt
so an active mazelike process
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
much more tactility
i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike
no like which do people call me
isaac newton
but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
isaac
god being the centre magnet
i believe search always should be immersive, because whatever is pre planned and non consuming (what you are looking for is total engulfment by the spectre of the real), a joyous intensity, a flow of virtue
we can only engage in such a way