like first name

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

i have read not even 1 book

all that is to say

what do you think my name is

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

propensity within someone

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

much more tactility

ahnaf abrar

whats your name?

isaac newton

barren land

i believe search always should be immersive, because whatever is pre planned and non consuming (what you are looking for is total engulfment by the spectre of the real), a joyous intensity, a flow of virtue

autonomy of learning

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

we can only engage in such a way

lol

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

i love it here

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged

i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation