was it worth it

so the method has to be autonomous

not their contents

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:38:49

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

its performative

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

which magnetises chains of pins

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged

no i haven't really read anything

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me

what do you mean

you have a beautiful account btw

have you read

magnetises a pin

kind of mythopoesis

brb i will read and reply sincerely

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

isaac

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

its good

ion

propensity within someone