there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
not their contents
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
I wonder if the birds knew I was watching?
Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.
so at the end
yeah
The Hatton geezer (fuck off) reminds me of this old failed actor who I'd met at a party a few years ago, another man out of time and out of place. This actor had scored a minor role in Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels and never really let go of it, had gone on to build his whole identity around it. I can't really blame him.
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
is everyoneback on tumblr now
a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it
i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
its good
much more tactility
It's
dusk
in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.Mon, 01 Dec 2025 23:38:15
autonomy of learning
i really havent
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
i have read not even 1 book
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
its performative