.png)
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
which magnetises chains of pins
thank you
Their voices are saying they haven't and shouldn't fuck but want to so bad, or have fucked and can't again but want to so bad, or something like that. Would this be easier if they were birds? Incel kind of question... I'm not following the conversation, but I'm still listening. He's talking in this slightly begging way. It's a way of talking that asks for pity, like he's already tried appealing to every other one of her sensibilities. Incel kind of observation... Maybe he just talks like that, in some upspeak derivative. Haha unless?
propensity within someone
i really havent
wow, you are the first stranger to write a textwall to me
as in
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
ion
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
and the fake qualifier
its good
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
have you read
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
Can I see
no longer writing in the third person
its good
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
not their contents
the site i am dreaming
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 21:54:03