is this you as well
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
all that is to say
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
not their contents
division of reality is straying away from it
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting
you cannot feed someone truth
yeah
The bird dives back into the tree. It shakes, some leaves fall.
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
but really the thing should be autonomous
send your tumblr
"I'm only attracted to you", he replies. "Like, you only."
i am quite illiterate on producing technology
...