fw

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i dont understand magnetisation

like magnets

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

what do you mean

barren land

your feed looks like my tumblr

so the method has to be autonomous

ion

isaac newton

which magnetises chains of pins

plato

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

division of reality is straying away from it

whats your name?

or never left

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

isaac

idk

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

its good

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

like first name

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

propensity within someone

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

not so on: yvf(wthw)

and so on. not wanting the rhyming / clanging

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book