idk

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

god being the centre magnet

all that is to say

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

what do you mean

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

no i haven't really read anything

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

as in

whats your name?

we can only engage in such a way

Above and in front two birds are darting in and out of a tree. Sometimes they collide to fight or maybe mate, but I can't really make it out in the low light. It's just after

dusk

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

which magnetises chains of pins

in a post. I want to be remembered

Today I felt like starting

its performative

i dont understand magnetisation

isaac newton

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

Style

is everyoneback on tumblr now

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

so at the end