theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine
i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
I've found the girl, or she's found me, and we're smoking a cigarette while we watch the silhouettes of the French Raj and his fireworks bearer down on the bank.
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
and the fake qualifier
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
was it worth it
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
plato
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
have you read
division of reality is straying away from it
no i haven't really read anything
no like which do people call me
isaac newton
its good short few pages
autonomy of learning
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful
Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.
but really the thing should be autonomous
not their contents
"Put a blanket."