...
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
much more tactility
you cannot feed someone truth
propensity within someone
ion
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
its good
thank you
like first name
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
as in
which magnetises chains of pins
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
i understand
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
not their contents
abrar?
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
was it worth it
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
its good
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
autonomy of learning
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
whats your name?
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
i really havent
ahnaf abrar