and the fake qualifier
Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:38:49
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
I wonder if the birds knew I was watching?
its performative
She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.
Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.
as in
13 |
|
|
H |
|
|
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
|
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
bro i read nothing in my life
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
you cannot feed someone truth
propensity within someone
i love it here
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
kind of mythopoesis
which magnetises chains of pins
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
Better Lift