okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

so an active mazelike process

we can only engage in such a way

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

autonomy of learning

brb i will read and reply sincerely

Lift Analysis

i see a website

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

so at the end

but really the thing should be autonomous

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

somewhere between instagram and chatgpt

much more tactility

Today I felt like starting