was it worth it
what do you mean
sorry i am texting like a slav
not their contents
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
so the method has to be autonomous
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
ion
i really havent
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
abrar?
all that is to say
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
and the fake qualifier
its performative
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
no like which do people call me
ahnaf abrar
is this you as well
plato
feel you
isaac newton
much more tactility
send your tumblr
is everyoneback on tumblr now